ES-2822 - Added the upload-file method for esignet-signup#1963
ES-2822 - Added the upload-file method for esignet-signup#1963prathmeshj12 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: prathmeshj12 <prathmesh.j@cyberpwn.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 29 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughA new static method ChangesRestClient multipart POST helper
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apitest-commons/src/main/java/io/mosip/testrig/apirig/utils/RestClient.java`:
- Around line 222-224: The multipart form field loop in RestClient should handle
a null map the same way files already do, instead of calling
multiPartFormFields.entrySet() unconditionally. Add a null check around the
multiPartFormFields iteration in the request-building path so requests with no
extra fields can still proceed. Keep the fix localized to the multipart handling
logic in RestClient.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: edfa070f-b3c4-4cea-9af2-459d68a21d6e
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apitest-commons/src/main/java/io/mosip/testrig/apirig/utils/RestClient.java
Signed-off-by: prathmeshj12 <prathmesh.j@cyberpwn.com>
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit